Palásthy Ildikó

Psychology and drama pedagogy

I have been researching the psychological aspects of drama pedagogy since 1981. I wrote  my doctoral dissertation as bachelor of arts in 1984, as well as my PhD thesis on the basis of examining the effect mechanisms of drama plays – in the Department of Psychology of the Debrecen University.

Theoretical conception

            Drama pedagogy is interdisciplinic, with its chararacter of having the effects of more sciences and arts - like theatre, psychology, and pedagogy - mingled within itself.

            From them we are interested in the psychological references to deal with. Psychological roots are to be found among the group psychoterapies, in the psychodrama. The common character of the psychodrama and the drama play is that they both use the means of expressions of the dramatic presentation. Their aim is the same, and it is the developement of the personality, the changing of the attitude and behaviour of the participants. All these are achieved within the safe framework of the group.

            Elements and grades of the effect mechanism are the same as well:

emotionally affected relationship,

introspection of the situation,

dramatic ventillation,

catharsis.

 

They have mutual ancestors (Moreno, Mérei) to be referred to, the exercises and techniques are the same, as well.

In the same time the psychodrama is much more conscious: it is examining group dinamic progressions, proceedings of effects, mechanism of effects, and is keen on controlling itself. In case of the drama group, the dramatic and the sociometric level appear from the layers of the group proceedings, their conscious ideation depends on the age.

The psychoterapic level of the group can not, of course, be undertaken by pedagogues.

Therefore the drama plays work rather by the theory of the dramatic ventillation. Spontainity is an important element of theirs, but e.g. in case of lower grade starting groups direct leadership is necessary.

 Drama group works on the basic condition of dependence, inherent in the teacher-student situation structure. Children expect being directed,  the teacher is regarded as to fulfill this function in the everyday life. Due to this fact, exercises are more determinant on these drama play sessions.

With the terminology of psychoterapies, drama group can be regarded as a self-recognitive group and a training group as well.

It is understood, that the personality developing and socializing character of the drama play is considered to be the most important thing.

The conception we accepted is based on the fact that drama play is able to connect children with themselves and with others, and to revitalize and introspect the realities and possibilities of human life. That is to say, we regard drama play to be a socializing activity.

Drama pedagogy is a means of personality developing processes, which enables the individual to increase his knowledge, skills, abilities, social connections in a group work through dramatic activities directed by the educator. The means of drama pedagogy are the drama plays.

Drama session is not an extroverting dramatic performance. The playing participants here study  to remember, imagine, performe human experiences. The dramatic activity is using time and space as well, its strength is to discover manyfolded meanings through a unique action as a dimension, and, by simulating and symbolizing human behaviours, it can create applicable modells for the community and the individual to be used in the present time and the future .

In the drama play children very actively go through various life situations in their mind. The regular playing activity becomes a practicing ground: it gives assurance in behaviour, gives chance to practice how to handle stress, participants gain knowledge of situations and self-behaving. Participation in the games has an effect on the social position and the sociability of the participants, it developes their empathic ability and tolerance. Drama play is also a means of self-expressing. It helps to develope creativity, meanwhile gives chance to beeing introduced with arts. 

 

The methods and material of the executed examinations

Our aim was to examine the effect mechanisms of the participation in drama play sessions. As one of the meanings of the world  effect has the aspect of result in itself, on one hand we regarded it our task to study the result, the effect caused by the drama play, on the other hand we, since the world effect has the aspect of activity as well, undertook the analysis of the nature, the source and the continuity of the coures of effecting.

Our hypotheses were: 

-         we assumed that central subject matters gradually tend to be more characteristic in the group proceedings,

-         general statements are more frequent at the beginning, and tend to deminish as group time passes by,

-         regarding personal statements, a counter-direction process is to be expected: during group proceedings we may assume their number will increase

-         in the experiment we assumed furthermore that children participating in the drama play sessions will study to react in a more adaptive way in situations of frustration,

-         their self-reflecting image and their relation to themselves will be more beneficient.

 

We formulated our working hypothesis that the methods suitable to analyse the effect mechanisms in psychodrama and group therapy courses will be suitable – due to their similar characteristics – to be used in the drama pedagogical proceedings as well, and thus we will have the opportunity to measure qualitative apparitions with quantitative methods.

 

Methods applied

1.      Course examinations

Methods examining group proceeding:

-         summing up of the content of the sessions, contouring the central

topics

-         describing the focal conflicts as the hidden content of the group

dinamics

-         determining the self-distance of the statements given to the central topic

 

During the sessions we kept the minutes of the proceedings in official reports. We determind the central topics of the group sessions with a content analysing system, based on the manifest and verbalized group content. The central topic is a unity of content of the session, which is a clearcut problem the group was interested in or involved with. We regarded the sentences articulated during the sessions as basic units for the content analysis.

            We discovered the focal conflicts of the group through analysing the statements given on the central topics, using the model of Stock-Whitaker and Lieberman. The focal conflict is the hidden problem behind the manifest group proceedings. The conflictuous group situation has two different characteristic features: a disturbing motif (inclination, desire) and a hidden motif (fear). The group, after having struggled with these forces, will bring forth the solution.

            When determining the personal statments given on the central topics, that is to say: the self-distance from the central topics, we differentiated between general and personal statements.

            The personal interaction is a self-involved, self-shared, emotion-embodied statement given on the central topics.

            The general interaction also refers to the central topics, but it is a distance-emphasizing statement.

 

2.      Result examinations

We have examined the changes in the personality by

§         coping questionary

§         self-picture questionary

§         and experience questionary.

 

We have prepared a situation-reaction questionary examining the struggle strategies. There are conditions lead to frustration (Activating Condition) and negative results (Expected Consequences) among the situations, the reactions are modelling the types of coping strategies:

                                   assimilative (task-orientated)

                                   accomodative (emotion-focused)

                                   avoidance (avoiding) struggles.

The persons examined had to judge and refer the pairs of attributes of a 7

graded scale of the self-image questionary to themselves.

The persons examined were due to mark the validity of the items of the

experience questionary on a 7 graded scale, as well.

We applied methods of mathemetics and statistics in evaluating the data.

 

The subject, the volume and the conditions of the examination                          

        We were working with 3rd grade students of elementary school, each occassion conncentrating on one separate drama group. In lack of qualified drama teachers, we did not have the possibility to start more groups. Since statistical verification was not one of our basic aims, we disregarded the quantitative equality between the examined group and the control group.

 

 Persons involved in the experiment:                                                                 

                                   1st phase:                        20 persons

                                   2nd phase                                     25 persons

 

Persons involved in the control groups

                                                                     1st phase                               52 persons

                                                                     2nd phase                              48 persons

 

The examinations were perfectuated in Debrecen. The drama group had been

having meetings for  half a year, once in a week (15 sessions in all).

 

Summing up of the results of the examination

                                 The results of the examination of the group proceedings

         The content analysation and the quantitative analysation of the interactions

in the drama play sessions verified our assumptions: by underlying the central

topics, it was  easy to discover a thematic trend, which casted light upon the

inner effect course of the group proceedings. Building up of themes takes place simultaneously with the structuralization of the group, showing the clear borderlines of the basic periods of the group proceedings: preparational phase (1st-3rd meeting), elaborational phase (4th-12th meeting) and finishing phase (13th-15th meeting).

The same structure appears when applying the focal conflict model. The focal conflicts of the 1st-3rd meetings deal with the novelty of the situation and the statements of the participants, the 4th-12th meetings realize the various ways of struggling and solving the conflicts, while the focal conflicts of the 13th-15th meetings indicate repetative tendencies.

The work of the drama group, through the elaborations of the central topics and the focal conflicts, shows up a periodical structure. Planning 15 sessions proved to be motivated, the group ran a clearcut route of development, closed a period, with a slight indication of a possible subject matter for the future.

         The results of the examinations of the personal statements verified our

         assumptions, too. Though we had to face the majority of general statements, the changing ratio of general and personal statements rhymes with the tendency anticipated above. The number of statements on the central topics, within the interactions in the sessions on one hand shows a notable increase, our data on the other hand verify that with the running out course time the number of the general statements also decreased, with an increasing number of the self-involved statements – which this way proves the group became capable of accepting the intimacies in an open atmosphere, and demonstrates the group has reached a higher stage.

 

Results of examininations in the self-involved group and in the control groups

         Our examinations prove a very significant personality developement of the

children participating in the drama sessions.

Regarding the struggle strategies, control groups show an unchanged, firm

coping profile, while members of experimental group, compared with their previous selves or with the control groups, mastered a higher level of applying strategies of assimilative, constructive, productive solutions in finding the stress situations and their results, as well as in handling problems, within the half year period of the drama session.

       The self-image examination also shows very favourable tendencies. The self-image of the children participating in the experiment shows a  400%  improvement, and as far as the final result is concerned, their self-image is much more positive than that of the controle group member`s one.

 We think the two personality projections, the strugle strategy and the self-image cling very closely together: a competent person who knows and accepts himself can relate himself to the world in a constructive way, as well.

The children experienced the same, they could exactly measure the importance of the drama session, its influence in the interpersonal relations, and they noticed the differencies between the results effected.

Drama can be regarded as approvable from the aspect of situative self-knowledge and adequate assimilative situation solution (in case of lower grade students), for self-knowledge and reaction style are mainly developed in company situations. With the special exercises of the drama pedagogy, with the simulated interpersonal actions it is possible to prepare and practice certain manners of behaviour, it is possible to get accustomed to endure and handle stresses of the conflicts of everyday life. Participants are all aware of this fact, as proved by the experience questionary.

      The aim of our examination was to reveal the results of participating in drama plays, what it causes in the personality, how and which ways this effect is caused by. We have no informations at all about similar drama pedagogical researches concentrating on the description and analysation of the activities in drama sessions. Nevertheless, we think it is impossible to obtain conscious persenality developing effects without the analisation of the effect mechanisms.

       Forces in the group, group dynamic actions, mastering the group leadership and group organizing ideas and methods may help drama teachers to become real catalyzers of the group proseedings in their own groups.

© Palásty Ildikó, 2002